WOODSTOCK 47 YEAR ANNIVERSARY

Woodstock 47 year anniversary
How America Has Lost Its Soul 

By LimanGuerrilla

The other day it was 47 years since the concert as it had never been, nor ever will be, was held - Woodstock 1969.
In order to become what it is today, America had to subjugate its own people, first. All the States are doing the world, today, has its roots in the 60s and 70s of the previous Century.
The Ohio National Guard before intervening in Bosnia and Herzegovina and occupied Kosovo and Metohija, had its first shot at Kent State University students, killing four and wounding nine on May 4, 1970.

Sandy Scheuer (20), William Schroeder (19), Allison
Krause (19), Jeffrey Glenn Miller (20) were the
first victims of the NWO force.
Several decades later, the Force came to Balkans

The casualties have counted among the students, who were protesting against the war in Vietnam. This was a time when the American people, especially young people was still free. Still thinking for themselves. The media represented the important component of freedom, at the time, because without accurate and true information, there is no substantive and real democracy. However, the creators of the New World Order have learnt a lesson. All acts that today's America does in the World have been learnt from the experience of the Third Reich and practiced on his own people.
Geo-strategic objectives of the New World Order are the objectives of the Third Reich. The manipulation with the media and the general public has been learnt from Goebbels.
But in order to move into the World, NWO had first to conquer America.
There is no more the strength, power, resistance that the American people, as a controller of their Government, possessed by the beginning of the seventh decade of the last century!

THE ORIGINS OF WORLD WAR III

A New World War for a New World Order

by By Andrew Gavin Marshall

The serial of three articles was written and published in 2009. However, it is interesting to read now, after seven years and see if it had lost some of its topicality, bearing in mind all we have learnt during that time.

Introduction

In Parts 1 and 2 of this series, I have analyzed US and NATO geopolitical strategy since the fall of the Soviet Union, in expanding the American empire and preventing the rise of new powers, containing Russia and China. This Part examines the implications of this strategy in recent years; following the emergence of a New Cold War, as well as analyzing the war in Georgia, the attempts and methods of regime change in Iran, the coup in Honduras, the expansion of the Afghan-Pakistan war theatre, and spread of conflict in Central Africa. These processes of a New Cold War and major regional wars and conflicts take the world closer to a New World War. Peace is only be possible if the tools and engines of empires are dismantled 

Colour-Coded Revolutions

by By Andrew Gavin Marshall

The serial of three articles was written and published in 2009. However, it is interesting to read now, after seven years and see if it had lost some of its topicality, bearing in mind all we have learnt during that time.

Introduction

Following US geo-strategy in what Brzezinski termed the “global Balkans,” the US government has worked closely with major NGOs to “promote democracy” and “freedom” in former Soviet republics, playing a role behind the scenes in fomenting what are termed “colour revolutions,” which install US and Western-friendly puppet leaders to advance the interests of the West, both economically and strategically. 

Part 2 of this essay on “The Origins of World War III” analyzes the colour revolutions as being a key stratagem in imposing the US-led New World Order. The “colour revolution” or “soft” revolution strategy is a covert political tactic of expanding NATO and US influence to the borders of Russia and even China; following in line with one of the primary aims of US strategy in the New World Order: to contain China and Russia and prevent the rise of any challenge to US power in the region.

THE ORIGINS OF WORLD WAR III

An Imperial Strategy For a New World Order

by By Andrew Gavin Marshall

The serial of three articles was written and published in 2009. However, it is interesting to read now, after seven years and see if it had lost some of its topicality, bearing in mind all we have learnt during that time.

Introduction

In the face of total global economic collapse, the prospects of a massive international war are increasing. Historically, periods of imperial decline and economic crisis are marked by increased international violence and war. The decline of the great European empires was marked by World War I and World War II, with the Great Depression taking place in the intermediary period. 

Currently, the world is witnessing the decline of the American empire, itself a product born out of World War II. As the post-war imperial hegemon, America ran the international monetary system and reigned as champion and arbitrator of the global political economy.

To manage the global political economy, the US has created the single largest and most powerful military force in world history. Constant control over the global economy requires constant military presence and action.

Now that both the American empire and global political economy are in decline and collapse, the prospect of a violent end to the American imperial age is drastically increasing.

This essay is broken into three separate parts. The first part covers US-NATO geopolitical strategy since the end of the Cold War, at the beginning of the New World Order, outlining the western imperial strategy that led to the war in Yugoslavia and the “War on Terror.” Part 2 analyzes the nature of “soft revolutions” or “colour revolutions” in US imperial strategy, focusing on establishing hegemony over Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Part 3 analyzes the nature of the imperial strategy to construct a New World Order, focusing on the increasing conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Latin America, Eastern Europe and Africa; and the potential these conflicts have for starting a new world war with China and Russia.

THE NEW LIBERAL IMPERIALISM

OK, after several days of absence, here I am again. The article I'm going to post is an old one. Exactly 14 years old. However, the subject of this article is still actual. Moreover, my country, the Region, and even broader have been living this article for about 25 years. Ever-since the Fall of the Berlin Wall. So, read it, and enjoy. It is very instructive. The guy who wrote this text is an important Pommy. The geopolitical adviser of one Anthony Charles Lynton "Tonny" Blair, an ex Prime minister of PommyLand and one Catherine Margaret Ashton, Baroness Ashton of Upholland, GCMG, the High European Commission Official.  

Intro by LG

Sir Robert Cooper (right) with Edita Tahiri and one Lirim
Greiçevci two Shiptars in London on 18 February 2013
during the fifth anniversary of so called independence
celebration of marionette false state of "Kosovo", that 
has been establish by the NATO occupier for  Shiptar 
national minority armed rebels and  terrorists on the 
Serbian occupied territories of Kosovo and Metohija 
Province. 

Senior British diplomat Robert Cooper has helped to shape British Prime Minister Tony Blair's calls for a new internationalism and a new doctrine of humanitarian intervention which would place limits on state sovereignty. Cooper's call for a new liberal imperialism and admission of the need for double standards in foreign policy have outraged the left but the essay offers a rare and candid unofficial insight into the thinking behind British strategy on Afghanistan, Iraq and beyond…

In 1989 the political systems of three centuries came to an end in Europe: the balance-of-power and the imperial urge. That year marked not just the end of the Cold War, but also, and more significantly, the end of a state system in Europe which dated from the Thirty Years War. September 11 showed us one of the implications of the change.

To understand the present, we must first understand the past, for the past is still with us. International order used to be based either on hegemony or on balance. Hegemony came first. In the ancient world, order meant empire. Those within the empire had order, culture and civilisation. Outside it lay barbarians, chaos and disorder. The image of peace and order through a single hegemonic power centre has remained strong ever since. Empires, however, are ill-designed for promoting change. Holding the empire together - and it is the essence of empires that they are diverse - usually requires an authoritarian political style; innovation, especially in society and politics, would lead to instability. Historically, empires have generally been static.