RESEARCH PAPER - KOSOVO AND METOHIA (3)

Kosovo and Metohija:

Serbia’s troublesome province^*

Dušan T. Bataković

Institute for Balkan Studies Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Belgrade

Abstract: Kosovo and Metohija, the heartland of medieval Serbia, of her culture, politics and economy (1204–1455), experienced continuous waves of spiralling violence, forced migration and colonization under centuries-long Ottoman rule (1455–1912). A region which symbolizes the national and cultural identity of the Serbian nation as a whole now has an Albanian majority population, who consider it an ancient Albanian land, claiming continuity with ancient Illyrians. Kosovo was reincorporated into Serbia (1912) and Yugoslavia (1918) as a region lacking tradition of inter-ethnic and inter-religious tolerance and cooperation. The two rivalling Kosovo nations, Albanians and Serbs, remained distant, maintaining limited interethnic communication throughout the twentieth century. The mounting national and ideological conflicts, reinforced by the communist ideology, made coexistence almost impossible, even after the 1999 NATO bombing campaign and establishment of KFOR-secured UN administration. Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence in February 2008 is a dangerous attempt to establish a second Albanian state extended into the heartland of Serbia, a failed state cleansed of both Serbs and other major non-Albanian communities.

Keywords: Serbia, Kosovo, ethnic strife, nationalism and communism, Kosovo crisis, NATO bombing, war against Yugoslavia, international protectorate

The Second World War: persecution, forced migrations, Albanization 

After the Yugoslav kingdom was dismembered by the Axis powers in April 1941, the Serbs, perceived as the main culprits for anti-Nazi resistance in the western Balkans, were severely punished by Hitler, in contrast to the Albanians, who were fully recompensed. By the decree of King Victor Emanuel III of 12 August 1941, most of Kosovo-Metohija was annexed to a fascist-sponsored “Greater Albania”, a possession of the Italian crown. The new fascist rulers granted the Kosovo Albanians the right to fly their own flag and to use Albanian as a medium of instruction in schools. The newly-acquired national symbols received an enthusiastic response from the mostly tribal and rural Albanian population of Kosovo. Nevertheless, the Kosovo Albanians were not willing to restrict their activities to the cultural and political domains. There ensued a full-scale revenge against the Serbs, perceived as oppressors under the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.²⁹ At least 10,000 perished and roughly 100,000 were expelled.

Moreover, as early as 1941 a project was launched to settle Albanians from northern and central Albania on the abandoned farms of both native Kosovo Serbs and Serb colonists: “The Italian occupation force encouraged an extensive settlement program involving up to 72,000 Albanians.”³⁰ At various points during the Second World War, Kosovo was a real bloodbath, involving conquering armies and Albanian extremists. Large-scale destruc-tion of Serb colonist villages was a major component of a strategic plan: to demonstrate to any potential post-war international commission re-sponsible for drawing new borders that Serbs had never lived in Kosovo. A prominent Kosovo Albanian leader, Ferat-beg Draga, solemnly announced in 1943 that the “time has come to exterminate the Serbs [...] there will be no Serbs under the Kosovo sun.”³¹

In September 1943, after Mussolini was defeated and Italy capitu-lated, Kosovo came under the direct control of Nazi Germany. Albanian na-tionalism was spurred on by the creation of the “Second Albanian League”, while the infamous Albanian-staffed SS Waffen “Scanderbeg” division launched a new campaign of violence against the remaining Serbian ci-vilians.³² According to the first, although incomplete, post-war Yugoslav estimations, there were in Kosovo and Metohija 5,493 killed or missing persons and 28,412 imprisoned or disabled persons, most of them Serbs.³³

The Yugoslav communists were instrumental in bringing the Alba-nian communists to power. In the membership of the newly-established Communist Party of Albania (formed and organized under the supervision of Yugoslav instructors Miladin Popović and Dušan Mugoša), there were numerous advocates of the Greater Albanian idea. Its leader, Enver Hoxha, had taken the first step towards an agreement concerning the creation of a post-war Greater Albania. Albanian communists joined forces with the Balli Kombëtar, an active nationalist organization, but the agreement be-tween the two movements reached in 1943 turned out to be a short-lived one.³⁴

Furthermore, the Bujan Declaration of the Kosovo Albanian com-munist representatives (including numerous representatives of Albania), is-sued on 2 January 1944, called for union of Kosovo and Metohija with Al-bania after the victory of the communist guerrilla.³⁵ This idea was promptly dismissed by the Yugoslav communist leadership under the Moscow-ap-pointed Secretary-General Josip Broz Tito. Tito considered the Bujan Declaration as premature and damaging to the common communist goals in the decisive phase of the Second World War.

A large-scale Albanian rebellion against communist Yugoslavia in late 1944 highlighted the necessity of maintaining Kosovo and Metohija within Serbia even under the new Soviet-type federal system. In Novem-ber 1944, this area of Serbia was liberated from Nazi occupation by Tito’s communist forces, the partisans. The Balli Kombëtar supporters and other Albanian units, rearmed and recently recruited into partisan formations, organized a large-scale uprising, attacking Tito’s partisan forces. The Al-banian revolt, which managed to mobilize roughly 40,000 nationalists in January 1945, as well as an undetermined number of those Albanians who had been settled in Kosovo from Albania proper during the wartime years, was brutally crushed only when additional Yugoslav troops were brought in and military rule was set up in Kosovo and Metohija between February and May 1945. Furthermore, after a series of bloody clashes and significant losses on both sides, the Albanian revolt in certain areas, such as Drenica, assumed the proportions of a small-scale civil war over Kosovo.³⁶

Communist Yugoslavia: failed reconciliation 
After the war and the communist takeover, Yugoslavia was restored as a Soviet-style communist federation, with a constitutional system inspired by the 1937 Soviet Constitution. Serbia became one of six Yugoslav federal units, and the only one internally federalized: with one province (Vojvo-dina) and a region (Kosovo and Metohija) within her borders. Moreover, a major privilege was granted to communist Albania, still dominated by Yu-goslav communists: a decree of 6 March 1945 issued by Yugoslav commu-nist authorities banned the return of Serbian inter-war colonists to Kosovo and Metohija, a decision that made most of 60,000 Kosovo Serb civilians, waiting to be resettled elsewhere, temporarily homeless or internally dis-placed persons.³⁷ In contrast, most of roughly 75,000 ethnic Albanians from Albania colonized during the Italian Fascist and Nazi Germany occupation remained living within Serbia after 1945, settled in vacant Serbian posses-sions in fertile plains of both Metohija and Kosovo. In most cases, the old and new settlers from Albania in Kosovo, whose number has never been accurately established, were granted the citizenship of Serbia within the Yugoslav federation.³⁸

Kosovo and Metohija was given the status of a region (oblast) in 1946, and was elevated to an autonomous province (pokrajina) in 1963, a status granted to Vojvodina in 1946 within federalized Serbia. J. B. Tito, the lifetime dictator of the second, communist and federal, Yugoslavia, had been raised in the Habsburg atmosphere of constant fear of the alleged “Greater Serbian danger”. Furthermore, Tito was politically structured un-der the ideological pattern of Lenin’s doctrine that the nationalism of larger nations is more dangerous than the nationalism of smaller ones. Thus, from the communist takeover in 1945 until the end of his lifetime dictatorship in 1980, J. B. Tito remained consistent in rooting out any visible, symbolic or real, manifestation of “Serbian hegemony”. Most of the Serbian pre-war elites had been destroyed during the communist “red terror” (1944–1947), and post-war Serbia was placed under the rule of Tito’s confidants from the ranks of Serbian communists. From 1945 the alleged Serbian hegemony, an obsession of the Yugoslav communists (most senior Serbian party members included), was perceived as the embodiment of the Serbian-led regime of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia as well as a permanent ideological threat to communism.³⁹

Although Tito described inter-republican boundaries established in 1945 merely as lines on a granite column bonding nations and minorities into communist “brotherhood and unity”, it was obviously an ideological langue de bois. In an interview to the Paris daily Le Monde in 1971 the prom-inent Yugoslav dissident Milovan Djilas did, however, confess that the post-Second World War partitioning of the Serb-inhabited lands in Yugoslavia into five out of the six constituent republics had been aimed at reducing the “centralism and hegemonism of the Serbs” seen as the main “obstacle” to the establishment of communism.⁴⁰

Royal Yugoslavia (1918–1941) had been a French-inspired nation-state marked by the Serbian, Jacobin and centralist, vision of Yugoslavism, whereas communist Yugoslavia (1945–1992) was based on an opposite model: federal, Croat vision of Yugoslav unity. Within such a context, the Albanian minority of Kosovo and Metohija was to play an important politi-cal role. National integration of Albanians lagged a whole century behind the other Balkan nations. The Albanians remained in communist Yugosla-via against their will, but they shared with other nationalists in the commu-nist ranks some strong anti-Serb interests, highly compatible with the main ideological goals of the ruling Communist Party.⁴¹

During the period of centralism in Yugoslavia (1945–1966) in reac-tion to Tito’s split with Stalin in 1948, Albania was part, until 1961, of the Soviet bloc which was hostile towards Yugoslavia. Tito entrusted control over Kosovo, and the rest of Yugoslavia, mostly to communist Serb cadres, as they represented the ironclad guarantee of Yugoslavia’s integrity. On the other hand, after the reconciliation with Moscow (1955), and as part of the efforts towards reconciliation with Albania (1968–1971), Tito tended to favour the Kosovo Albanians in spite of recurrent upsurges of their nationalism.

Also, between 1966 and 1974 a process of decentralization was un-folding, for the most part based on the plans of Tito’s main ideological advi-sor, Edvard Kardelj. The Constitution of 1974 marked a significant transfer of power to the federal units. The whole process, which institutionalized national-communism, eventually led to a renewal of interethnic tensions in the intricate mosaic of nations and confessions of Yugoslavia. Through the model of national-communism shaped by E. Kardelj, the power of federal jurisdiction came to reside in the ruling oligarchies of the republics. Thus the Party nomenklatura, becoming sovereign in their respective republics, came to represent the majority nationality. As the only federal republic with two autonomous provinces, Serbia was an exception, since, under the 1974 Constitution, the provinces could use their veto power against the rest of Serbia.⁴²

National-communism introduced majority rule for the majority nation in each of the six republic and two provinces of the federation. As a result, discrimination against small-in-numbers nations or national minorities within the boundaries of each republic or province continued, to a greater or lesser extent. That was the context in which the status of the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija was significantly upgraded by the constitutional amendments of 1968 and 1972, and finally defined by the 1974 Constitution: it gave Kosovo Albanians the main say in political life.⁴³ The policy of entrusting rule over Kosovo to Albanians was endorsed by Tito, anxious to placate the growing Albanian nationalism in Kosovo. Being a renowned leader of the non-aligned movement and a high-rank-ing statesman on the international scene, Tito could ill afford to have in his neighbourhood a small Stalinist Albania continuing her violent ideological attacks on Yugoslavia, thereby challenging both her ideology and her state unity. Only several years after the 1968 Albanian demonstrations praising Albania’s leader Enver Hoxha in Priština and two other towns of Kosovo, did Tito allow closer cooperation between Priština and Tirana in the vain hope that this rapprochement would appease the national discontent of the Yugoslav Albanian community.⁴⁴ The Kosovo Albanians interpreted the new party policy launched in 1968 not as an additional opportunity for furthering their national and cultural development but rather as a long-awaited occasion for an ultimate historical revenge against the Serbs, still considered as archenemies keeping Albanian Kosovo under occupation.⁴⁵ Furthermore, from 1968 the ideologi-cal and national model embraced by the Albanians of Kosovo and Metohija became Enver Hoxha’s Stalinist-type of rigid ethno-nationalism, promoted by imported textbooks and visiting professors from Tirana at Priština Uni-versity, and above all by numerous Sigurimi agents from Albania. They all professed a simplified nationalistic ideology imbued both with a Stalinist hatred towards enemies and with old Albanian fanaticism, directed mainly against the Serbs. An Albanian-dominated assembly of Kosovo removed the term “Metohija” from the province’s official name as early as 1968, for it sounded too Serbian and too Christian. It was a classical case of historical revisionism used as a tool to advance a political agenda in the present. The process involved repeated cases of discrimination against the Kosovo Serbs throughout the 1970s and early 1980s, and eventually escalated into large-scale Albanian demonstrations. The Kosovo Serb communist nomenklatura, with few exceptions, accepted this policy of institutionalized discrimination, and was rewarded with higher positions in republican or federal institutions.

The enhanced status of Kosovo and Metohija within Serbia was the last but fatal legacy of the declining Titoist system. In spite of the dis-agreement openly expressed by some Serb cadres and the well-founded prediction by some members of the academic community⁴⁶ that the new constitutional arrangements would lead to the inevitable disintegration of Yugoslavia, the final result of the centrifugal process was the adoption of the Constitution of 1974. Thus a constitution that left no room for a non-violent dissolution of post-Titoist Yugoslavia remained the country’s legal framework after Tito’s death in 1980.⁴⁷

What ensued in Kosovo as its direct consequence was a series of ad-ministrative pressures, including judicial discrimination, police harassments and occasional physical attacks against the Serbs by the Albanians. Once the new party policy was tacitly endorsed within the federal leadership, the discrimination and harassment of the Kosovo Serbs intensified, leading to their forced migration from Kosovo to inner Serbia. The process unfolded silently, and although many high political and army officials were fully aware of it, few ever dared speak publicly. The result of this silent process of ethnic cleansing — not just tolerated, but even encouraged by the federal com-munist leadership — the Serb population in Kosovo and Metohija, despite a relatively high birth rate, was dramatically reduced by nearly a half: from 23.6 percent according to the 1948 census to 13.2 percent according to the 1981 census. The Montenegrin population in Kosovo was also decreasing: from 3.9 percent in 1948 to 1.7 percent in 1981.⁴⁸

This ethnically motivated persecution also targeted the Serbian Orthodox Church, perceived as the pillar of Serbian identity in the Province: bishops, priests, monks and nuns were attacked, graveyards desecrated and agrarian landed property usurped. Numerous instances of continuous persecution by both Albanian nationalists and Albanian provincial bureau-crats were reported to the Serbian Orthodox Church by the Bishopric of Raška-Prizren (covering the whole of Kosovo and Metohija) in May 1969. The Serbian Patriarch German was compelled to request urgent protection from Tito, but not even that brought any tangible results.⁴⁹ After fourteen years of their undisputed and discriminatory rule in the Province, in March 1981 the Albanians announced a new phase of their separatist policy: the Albanian extremists set fire to the Patriarchate of Peć, a historic seat of the Serbian Orthodox Church.⁵⁰

The carefully prepared and fully orchestrated Albanian rebellion in March and April 1981, initially described as a genuine student revolt, evolved within weeks into a large-scale nationalistic movement demanding the status of a seventh federal republic for Kosovo within Yugoslavia. The demanded status involved the right to self-determination, a Leninist constitutional provision reserved for the constituent communist republics. Put forth in 1981, only a year after Tito’s death, the Albanian demand disturbed the sensitive balance of power in the federal leadership and challenged the sustainability of the whole system established in 1974.⁵¹

None of the attempts to pacify the Albanian revolt both by means of the regular communist practice of successive party purges and by repression (actions of the federal military and police forces against Albanian protesters, large-scale legal prosecution and punishment afflicting mostly younger age groups) yielded expected results. On the other hand, the League of Communists’ simultaneous effort to minimize the problem of discrimination against the Serbs and of their forced migration from Kosovo and Metohija only led to the growing frustration of the Serbs all over Yugoslavia in the years that followed.

Tacitly backing Albanian nationalism, institutionalized by the 1974 Constitution, the Yugoslav federal leadership created dangerous tensions which were difficult to control: on the one hand, from 1981 Albanian pro-testers were repeatedly prosecuted and sentenced and, on the other, self-organized groups of Kosovo Serbs staged mass protests before Yugoslav federal institutions gaining wide popular support in Belgrade.⁵² Kosovo Serbs were given both moral and political support by priests, monks and bishops of the Serbian Orthodox Church, which was generally perceived as the archenemy of the communist regime. As a result of its statements and petitions denouncing the situation as a “cultural and spiritual genocide” against the Serbs and the Serbian Christian heritage (desecration of churches, monasteries and graveyards, harassment and attacks on monks and nuns, etc.), widely distributed through the religious press, the Serbian Church ceased to be seen as a parochial and conservative organization, and in public perception re-assumed the role it had played under Ottoman rule, that of a quite natural protector of national interests in times of crisis.⁵³

Despite often severe repression by federal forces during the 1980s, the rising Albanian nationalism made the post-Titoist system unsustainable. It was in fact the Albanian extremists that eventually, in 1987, brought Slobodan Milošević, a Serbian hard-line party apparatchik, to power. He had come to be perceived as “defender” of the Serbian cause, at first in Kosovo and then throughout Yugoslavia. On 26 March 1989, the semi-republican status of the two Serbian provinces, Kosovo and Vojvodina, was reduced to standard competencies of autonomous regions rather than abolished: the 1989 amendments to the Constitution of 1974 annulled the right of the two provinces to have two separate legislatures, abolished the veto power held by the provincial legislatures over the legislature of Serbia, placed authority over international relations into the hands of the republic, and limited the debate period to six months, after which the matter was to be decided by a referendum.

To be continued: Limited autonomy, intensified nationalism, escalating conflicts

---

^* An earlier version of this paper was presented at the University of Ottawa, Canada, on 6 March 2008. 

²⁹ The Italian government supplied the Kosovo area with an Albanian volunteer militia, initially 5000-strong — Vulnetari — to help the Italian forces maintain order as well as to independently perform surprise attacks on the largely unarmed Serb population.

³⁰ M. Vickers, Between Serb and Albanian, 123.

³¹ H. Bajrami, “Izveštaj Konstantina Plavšića Tasi Diniću, ministru unutrašnjih poslova u Nedićevoj vladi oktobra 1943, o kosovsko-mitrovačkom srezu”, Godišnjak Arhiva Ko-sova XIV–XV (1978–1979), 313; cf. also J. Pejin, Stradanje Srba u Metohiji 1941–1944 (Belgrade: Arhivski pregled, 1994).

³² d. t. Bataković, Kosovo Chronicles, 13–17; for a detailed account see L. Latruwe and G. Kostic, La Division Skanderbeg. Histoire des Waffen SS albanais des origines idéologiques aux débuts de la Guerre Froide (Paris: Godefroy de Bouillon, 2004).

³³ Arhiv Jugoslavije [Archives of Yugoslavia], Belgrade, vol. 54-20-47.

³⁴ Balli Kombëtar (National Front) was an Albanian nationalist military organization led by Midhat Frasheri and Ali Klissura. Its main political objective was not only integration of Kosovo-Metohija into an Italian-sponsored “Greater Albania”, but ethnic cleansing of the region of all, or at least of the majority, of its Christian Orthodox Serb population in order to secure the safe development of this region as exclusively Albanian in the future. The short-lived agreement with the CPA and the Balli Kombëtar of 1942 became irrelevant after the full collaboration of Ballists with the Nazis following the capitulation of Italy in September 1943.

³⁵ Konferenca e Bujanit (Tirana: Akademia e Shkencave e Republikës së Shqipërise, In-stituti i Historisë, 1999).

³⁶ The official communist version, including some original documents, is available in the memoirs of the commander of Titoist troops involved in suppressing the Albanian revolt: S. Djaković, Sukobi na Kosovu, 2nd ed. (Belgrade: Narodna knjiga, 1986), 225–236; according to confidential military reports quoted in the same book (pp. 236–237), between 10 February and 15 April 1945 casualties on the side of Albanian rebels were 393 killed and 490 wounded, and on the side of Tito’s partisans, 82 killed and 117 wounded.

³⁷ “Privremena zabrana vraćanja kolonista u njihova ranija mesta življenja”, No 153, Službeni list DFJ 13 of 16 March 1945; “Zakon o reviziji dodjeljivanja zemlje kolonisti-ma i agrarnim interesentima u Makedoniji i u Kosovsko-metohijskoj oblasti”, Službeni list DFJ 56 of 5 August 1945; cf. also Službeni list FNRJ 89, 1946.

³⁸ According to the 1948 census, the total number of Albanians, despite the heavy war losses reported by Albanians themselves, had augmented by 75,417 within nine years; cf. P. Živančević, Emigranti. Naseljavanje Kosova i Metohije iz Albanije (Belgrade: Eksportpress, 1989), 78. The latest research, based on official although incomplete documentation, scales down the number of political immigrants from Albania in the 1950s, given that they used Yugoslavia mostly as a transit country towards Western Europe, cf. B. Hrabak, “Albanski emigranti u Jugoslaviji”, Tokovi istorije 1–2 (1994), 77–104. However, the movements of peasants from Albania crossing the border and settling in border villages in Metohija or in Kosovo, do not seem to have been accurately tracked, at least after 1968.

³⁹ D. T. Bataković, “Twentieth-Century Kosovo-Metohija: Migrations, Nationalism and Communism”, Serbian Studies 13:2 (1999), 1–23; D. T. Bataković, “Kosovo à l’époque titiste: entre nationalisme et communisme”, Les Annales de l’autre Islam 7 (2000), 205–224.

⁴⁰ Le Monde, Paris, 30 December 1971.

⁴¹ D. T. Bataković, “Frustrated Nationalism in Yugoslavia: from Liberal to Communist Solution”, Serbian Studies 11:2 (1997), 67–85.

⁴² D. T. Bataković, “Nationalism and Communism: The Yugoslav Case”, Serbian Studies 9:1–2 (1995), 25–41.

⁴³ Cf. legal documentation in a bilingual Serbian-English edition Kosovo: Law and Politics. Kosovo in Normative Acts before and after 1974 (Belgrade: Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, 1998).

⁴⁴ The most prominent Kosovo scholar, the orientalist Hasan Kaleshi, was among the first to condemn in the 1970s the propagation of ethnic hatred in textbooks and related historical writings in Albanian. He died a few years later under dubious circumstances. Cf. H. Kaleshi, “O seobama Srba sa Kosova krajem XVII i početkom XVIII veka, etničkim promenama i nekim drugim pitanjima iz istorije Kosova”, Obeležja VI:4 (1976); see also M. Mišović, “Ko je tražio republiku Kosovo”, Književne novine, 1987.

⁴⁵ The defiant Kosovo officials, both Serbs and ethnic Turks (e.g. Kadri Reufi), who dared denounce ethnic discrimination, were punished and expelled from the Communist Party. On the other hand, some Serbian officials who cooperated with the Albanian leadership on their new policy of replacing Serbs by Albanians in all important offices in Kosovo’s provincial institutions were rewarded with high posts in federal or diplomatic bodies, and thus left Kosovo forever; cf. D. T. Bataković, Kosovo Chronicles, 70.

⁴⁶ Most prominently by Prof. Mihailo Djurić and a group of law professors and researchers from the Law School of Belgrade University.

⁴⁷ For Yugoslavia, more in S. K. Pavlowitch, The Improbable Survivor. Yugoslavia and its Problems 1918–1988 (London: Hurst & Co, 1988); D. T. Bataković, Yougoslavie. Nations, religions, idéologies (Lausanne: L’Age d’Homme, 1994).

⁴⁸ R. Petrović and M. Blagojević, The Migration of Serbs and Montenegrins from Kosovo and Metohija. Results of the Survey Conducted in 1985–1986 (Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, 1992).

⁴⁹ The Patriarch’s letter is reproduced in Zadužbine Kosova, 833.

⁵⁰ For American journalists’ credible reports on Albanian demands and the difficult position of Kosovo Serbs since 1981, see M. Howe “Exodus of Serbians Stirs Province in Yugoslavia”, The New York Times, 12 July 1982; J. Diehl “Ethnic Rivalries cause unrest in Yugoslav Region”, Washington Post Foreign Service Saturday, 29 November 1986; D. Binder, “In Yugoslavia, Rising Ethnic Strife Brings Fears of Worse Civil Conflict”, The New York Times, 1 November 1987.

⁵¹ N. Beloff, Tito’s Flawed Legacy. Yugoslavia and the West since 1999 (Boulder: Westview Press, 1985), 209–214.

⁵² Cf. A. Jeftić, Od Kosova do Jadovna (Belgrade: Srpska Pravoslavna Crkva, 1986); K. Magnusson “The Serbian Reaction: Kosovo and Ethnic Mobilization Among the Serbs”, Nordic Journal of Soviet & East European Studies 43 (1987), 3–30.

⁵³ “Declaration of the Bishops of the Serbian Orthodox Church against the Genocide by the Albanians on the Indigenous Serbian Population, together with the Sacrilege of their Cultural Monuments in their own Country”, South Slav Journal 11:2–3 (40–41) (London 1988), 61–64; 87–89.